Gemini x ChatGPT: A discussion of two Chatbots about Artificial Intelligence in the Education
Abstract views: 20
/ 
PDF downloads: 13
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Education, Chatbots, Gemini, ChatGPTAbstract
The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and intelligent teaching and learning tools is becoming
increasingly common in everyday education. At present, chatbots are undoubtedly the AI technology that
is easily accessible not only to educators but also to students from almost any internet-connected device.
However, we know that chatbots, in addition to their many potentials, also pose risks to education.
Depending on this, we need to use them within appropriate limits. The first half of our study builds on
international literature that examines the impact of chatbots on education. In addition, we reviewed
literature that measured the potential of today's most popular chatbots within the teaching of specific
subjects. Many surveys show that both teachers and students are open to the use of AI. But how do these
intelligent systems and tools relate to the AI-influenced educational process? To answer this question, we
conducted a small study using two chatbots, ChatGPT and Gemini, formerly known as Bard. Our study
was based on a discussion between the two chatbots, which focused on the potential applications of AI
within education. The results of our survey show that, although the chatbots highlighted some of the
possibilities that AI offers within education, they did not cover the whole field. Rather, the
communication focused on a few points that were repeatedly touched on, ignoring the fact that they had
already been discussed in detail a few paragraphs earlier. In any case, we consider it an interesting aspect
to examine the subject from an AI perspective. Further research, possibly involving more chatbots, may
be necessary in the future.
Downloads
References
S. Cunningham-Nelson, Sam, W. Boles, L. Trouton, and E. Margerison, “A review of chatbots in education: Practical steps forward,” in 30th Annual Conference for the Australasian Association for Engineer- ing Education (AAEE 2019): Educators Becoming Agents of Change: Innovate, Integrate, Motivate. Engineers Australia, Australia, p. 299-306, 2019.
L. K. Fryer, M. Ainley, A. Thompson, A. Gibson, and Z. Sherlock, “Stimulating and sustaining interest in a language course: An experimental comparison of chatbot and human task partners,” Computers in Human Behavior, 75, p. 461–468, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.045
G. J. Hwang, and C. Y. Chang, “A review of opportunities and challenges of chatbots in education,” Interactive Learning Environments, p. 1-14, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2021.1952615
S. Wollny, J. Schneider, D. Di Mitri, W. Joshua, M. Rittberger, and H. Drachsler, “Are We There Yet? - A Systematic Literature Review on Chatbots in Education,” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. vol 4. 654924, p. 1-18, 2021. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2021.654924.
Ch. Okonkwo, and A. Ade-Ibijola, “Chatbots applications in education: A systematic review,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 2. 100033. p. 1-10, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100033.
L. Labadze, M. Grigolia, and L. Machaidze, “Role of AI chatbots in education: systematic literature review,” Int J Educ Technol High Educ vol 20, no 56, p. 1-17, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00426-1
G. S. da Silva, V. R. Ulbricht, “ChatGPT and Bard in Education: A Comparative Review,” in International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age (CELDA), p. 369-376, 2023.
M. M. Rahman, and Y. Watanobe, “ChatGPT for Education and Research: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategies,” Appl. Sci. 13, 5783, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ app13095783
M. Halaweh, “ChatGPT in education: Strategies for responsible implementation,” Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2), ep421, 2023. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13036
P. Mahir, P. E. Hanifah, and S. Syarifuddin, “Discussing ChatGPT in education: A literature review and bibliometric analysis,” Cogent Education, 10:2, 2243134, 2023. DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2243134
S. Kılınç, “Embracing the future of distance science education: Opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT integration,” Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), p. 205-237, 2023. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7857396
Y. Motlagh, M. Khajavi, A. Sharifi, and M. Ahmadi, “The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Evolution of Digital Education: A Comparative Study of OpenAI Text Generation Tools including ChatGPT, Bing Chat, Bard, and Ernie,” arXiv, 2023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.02029
J. Rudolph, S. Tan, and S. Tan, “War of the chatbots: Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie and beyond. The new AI gold rush and its impact on higher education,” Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, vol 6 no 1, p. 364-389, 2023. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.23
X. Q., Dao. “Which Large Language Model should You Use in Vietnamese Education: ChatGPT, Bing Chat, or Bard?,” SSRN Electronic Journal, p. 1-12, 2023. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4527476.
(2024), AI Across Google: PaLM 2, Available: https://ai.google/discover/palm2/
(2023), OpenAI: GPT-4 Technical Report, ArXiv, Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774
N. Annuš, “Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence,” TEM Journal. vol 13, issue 1, p. 404-413, 2024. DOI: 10.18421/TEM131-42
