Cognitive Processes in Reading Comprehension: A Theoretical Framework for Foreign Language Acquisition
Abstract views: 80
/ 
PDF downloads: 517
Keywords:
Reading Comprehension, Cognitive Processes, Theoretical Framework, Second Language Acquisition, Third Language AcquisitionAbstract
Reading comprehension is a cognitive process essential for language acquisition, particularly
in the field of foreign language learning. This paper provides an in-depth exploration of the theoretical
foundations of cognitive psychology in the context of reading comprehension in both second and third
language acquisition (SLA/TLA). Through an examination of established theories such as schema theory
and cognitive load theory, the paper seeks to explain the cognitive processes involved in reading
comprehension among foreign language learners. By examining these theories, the paper aims to enhance
our understanding of how learners acquire reading skills and develop reading proficiency in foreign
languages and explains the cognitive mechanisms that facilitate this process. Furthermore, the paper
discusses the implications of these insights for language educators and researchers, highlighting the
importance of informed instructional practices and future research directions in the field of foreign
language acquisition. Through this exploration of cognitive processes in reading comprehension, the
paper contributes to advancing our knowledge of language acquisition and offers practical implications
for optimizing instructional strategies in foreign language learning contexts.
Downloads
References
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The Building Blocks of Cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension (pp. 33-58). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Carrell, P. L. (1981). Culture-Specific schemata in L2 Comprehension. In D. M. T. Hardison (Ed.), Second Language Reading: Perception and Procedure (pp. 88-100). Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Hudson, T. (1982). The Effects of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Background Knowledge on Comprehension of Discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(4), 454-465
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Eisterhold, J. (1983). Understanding Schemata: Techniques for the Reading Classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 17(1), 33-47.
Anderson, N. J. (1999). Exploring Second Language Reading: Issues and Strategies. Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Addison Wesley Longman.
Johnson, P. (1981). Effects on Reading of Schema Expectations for Prose. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(4), 501-526.
Carrell, P. L. (1985). Facilitating ESL Reading by Teaching Text Structure. TESOL Quarterly, 19(4), 727-752.
Casanave, C. P. (1988). Comprehension Monitoring in ESL Reading: A Neglected Essential. TESOL Quarterly, 22(2), 283-302.
Widdowson, H. G. (1990). Aspects of Language Teaching. Oxford University Press.
Oller, J. W. (1995). Language Test Construction and Evaluation. Blackwell Publishing.
Landry, R. G. (2002). The Role of Schema in Learning from Text. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 3, pp. 255-291). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Huang, S. (2009). Schema Theory in Reading. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(1), 138-142.
Carrell, P. L., & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). Schema Theory and ESL Reading Pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17(4), 553-573.
Eskey, D. E., & Grabe, W. (1988). Interactive Models for Second Language Reading: Perspectives on Instruction. Cambridge University Press.
Eskey, D. E. (1988). Holding in the Bottom: An Interactive Approach to the Language Problems of Second Language Readers. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading (pp. 95-109). Cambridge University Press.
Carrell, P. L., & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). Schema Theory and ESL Reading Pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17(4), 553-573.
Aebersold, J. A., & Field, M. L. (1997). From Reader to Reading Teacher: Issues and Strategies for Second Language Classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural Thought Patterns in Inter-cultural Education. Language Learning, 16(1-2), 1-20.
Long, M. H. (1989). Task, Group, and Task-Group Interaction. University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Nostrand, H. L. (1989). Linguistic and Cultural Factors in Second Language Acquisition. Language Learning, 39(1), 55-77.
Carrell, P. L. (1998). Can reading strategies be successfully taught? Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 1-20.
Koh, T. S. (1986). Culture and Second Language Learning. Singapore University Press.
Rumelhart, D. E., & Bransford, J. D. (1980). Toward an Explanatory Framework for Comprehension. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension (pp. 33-58). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Carrell, P. L. (1985). Facilitating ESL Reading by Teaching Text Structure. TESOL Quarterly, 19(4), 727-752.
Tudor, I., & Tuff, B. (1991). Writing Letters and Articles. Oxford University Press.
Carrell, P. L. (1983). Some Issues in Studying the Role of Schemata or Background Knowledge in Second Language Comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 1(2), 81-92.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.
Schnotz, W., & Kürschner, C. (2007). A Reconsideration of Cognitive Load Theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 469-508.
Diao, Y., & Sweller, J. (2007). Redundancy in foreign language reading comprehension instruction: Concurrent written and spoken presentations. Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 78-88.
Reif, F. (2010). Applying Cognitive Science to Education: Thinking and Learning in Scientific and Other Complex Domains. MIT Press.
Tharby, A. (2020). Cognitive Load Theory: Making Learning Stick. John Catt Educational.
Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147-177.
Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.
Pope, D. (2020). The Science of Learning: 99 Studies that Every Teacher Needs to Know. Crown House Publishing.
Shibli, D. (2020). Using Cognitive Load Theory to Develop Instructionally Supportive Materials for Teacher Educators. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 1851-1857.
Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Cognitive Load Theory: Implications of Cognitive Load Theory on the Design of Learning. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 1-10.
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63-71.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation Models in Language Comprehension and Memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162-185.
Moss, J., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2011). The Influence of Cognition on Mental Model Accuracy and Complexity. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(4), 628-642.
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293-332.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
