The Influence of Semi-Rigid Joints on the Seismic and cyclic Response on the structural steel


Abstract views: 28 / PDF downloads: 31

Authors

  • Hamid CHAFAI University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene “USTHB”
  • Abd Nacer Touati IHADDOUDENE University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene “USTHB”
  • Madi Wafa University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene “USTHB”

Keywords:

Semi-Rigid Joints, Structural Steel, Cyclic Loading, Seismic Behavior, Numerical Analysis

Abstract

Structural connections in steel structure are traditionally designed on the assumption that the
beam to column joint is either fully rigid or pinned. Numerous experimental, analytical, and numerical
studies have shown that their behavior is between these two extreme cases: it’s semi-rigid. The
consideration of their real behavior “semi-rigid joints” had an important impact on the overall behavior of
steel structures. In this study, a nonlinear numerical analysis was carried out on the steel structure under
cyclic and seismic loading. The joints were taken with rigid and semi-rigid behavior. The investigation
focuses on a four stories plane steel structure using the seismostruct software. The Richard-Abbott model
is employed to predict the nonlinear behavior of the semi-rigid joints. The consideration of semi-rigid joint
connections in seismic area has a very great impact on the behavior of structures and a good efficiency in
terms of energy dissipation for structures located in seismic zones.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Hamid CHAFAI , University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene “USTHB”

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Algeria

Abd Nacer Touati IHADDOUDENE , University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene “USTHB”

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Algeria

Madi Wafa, University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene “USTHB”

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Algeria

References

CEN, E. (2005). 1-1-Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures-Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.

Braham, M., & Jaspart, J. P. (2004). Is it safe to design a building structure with simple joints, when they are known to exhibit a semi-rigid behaviour?. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 60(3-5), 713-723.

Ashraf, M., Nethercot, D. A., & Ahmed, B. (2007). Sway of semi-rigid steel frames, part 2: Irregular frames. Engineering structures, 29(8), 1854-1863.

ElSabbagh, A., Sharaf, T., Nagy, S., & ElGhandour, M. (2019). Behavior of extended end-plate bolted connections subjected to monotonic and cyclic loads. Engineering Structures, 190, 142-159.

Ihaddoudène, A. N. T., Saidani, M., & Chemrouk, M. (2009). Mechanical model for the analysis of steel frames with semi rigid joints. Journal of constructional Steel research, 65(3), 631-640.

Aristizabal-Ochoa, J. D. (2010). Second-order slope–deflection equations for imperfect beam–column structures with semi-rigid connections. Engineering structures, 32(8), 2440-2454.

Faella, C., Martinelli, E., & Nigro, E. (2008). Analysis of steel–concrete composite PR-frames in partial shear interaction: A numerical model and some applications. Engineering structures, 30(4), 1178-1186.

Yang, J. G., & Lee, G. Y. (2007). Analytical model for the preliminary design of a single-storey multi-bay steel frame under horizontal and vertical loads. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 63(8), 1091-1101.

Razavi, M., & Abolmaali, A. (2014). Earthquake resistance frames with combination of rigid and semi-rigid connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 98, 1-11.

Da Silva, J. G. S., De Lima, L. R. O., Vellasco, P. D. S., De Andrade, S. A. L., & De Castro, R. A. (2008). Nonlinear dynamic analysis of steel portal frames with semi-rigid connections. Engineering Structures, 30(9), 2566-2579.

Mathe, A., Cătărig, A., & Moldovan, I. (2015). Statics and kinematics of semirigid steel frames under seismic action. Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences, 5(2), 59-64.

Al-Bermani, F. G. A., Li, B., Zhu, K., & Kitipornchai, S. (1994). Cyclic and seismic response of flexibly jointed frames. Engineering Structures, 16(4), 249-255.

Masoodi, A. R., & Moghaddam, S. H. (2015). Nonlinear dynamic analysis and natural frequencies of gabled frame having flexible restraints and connections. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 19, 1819-1824.

Chan, S. L., & Chui, P. T. (Eds.). (2000). Non-linear static and cyclic analysis of steel frames with semi-rigid connections. Elsevier.

Nogueiro, P., Silva, L. S., Bento, R., & Simões, R. (2007). Numerical implementation and calibration of a hysteretic model with pinching for the cycling response of steel joints. Advanced Steel Construction, 3(nº1), 459-484.

Fathizadeh, S. F., Dehghani, S., Yang, T. Y., Vosoughi, A. R., Farsangi, E. N., & Hajirasouliha, I. (2021). Seismic performance assessment of multi-story steel frames with curved dampers and semi-rigid connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 182, 106666.

Rigi, A., JavidSharifi, B., Hadianfard, M. A., & Yang, T. Y. (2021). Study of the seismic behavior of rigid and semi-rigid steel moment-resisting frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 186, 106910.

Lu, S., Wang, Z., Pan, J., & Wang, P. (2022, February). The seismic performance analysis of semi-rigid spatial steel frames based on moment-rotation curves of end-plate connection. In Structures (Vol. 36, pp. 1032-1049). Elsevier.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-13

How to Cite

CHAFAI , H., IHADDOUDENE , A. N. T., & Wafa, M. (2024). The Influence of Semi-Rigid Joints on the Seismic and cyclic Response on the structural steel . International Journal of Advanced Natural Sciences and Engineering Researches, 8(2), 510–516. Retrieved from https://as-proceeding.com/index.php/ijanser/article/view/1751

Issue

Section

Articles