Effect of Metacognitive Strategies on Students to Achieve Sustainable Learning Skills
Abstract views: 15
/ 
PDF downloads: 30
Keywords:
Metacognition, Strategies, SkillsAbstract
This research examines how metacognitive methods affect students' sustainable learning abilities.
Metacognition—the awareness and modulation of cognitive processes—is crucial to successful learning. The
study uses qualitative methodology to determine the relationship between metacognitive tactics and academic
achievement and qualitative analysis to understand students' perspectives. The results show that metacognitive
methods improve learning outcomes. Metacognitive processes improve self-awareness, goal-setting, and
adaptive learning, laying the groundwork for academic achievement. Quality statistics reveal how
metacognitive methods improve critical thinking, problem-solving, and learning comprehension. This study
advances educational psychology and helps instructors improve students' metacognition. Understanding how
metacognition affects sustainable learning may help create successful pedagogical interventions and curricula,
making students more resilient and adaptive in the ever-changing education context.
Downloads
References
Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember; a problem of metacognition. Advances in instructional psychology.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. The nature of intelligence.
Piaget, J. (1986). Essay on necessity. Human development, 29(6), 301-314.
Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practicioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books New York.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary educational psychology, 19(4), 460-475.
Schraw, G., Kuch, F., & Gutierrez, A. P. (2013). Measure for measure: Calibrating ten commonly used calibration scores. Learning and Instruction, 24, 48-57.
Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Staley, R., & DuBois, N. (2004). Metacognition and self-regulated learning constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 117-139.
