An assessment of the rational method's limitations for calculating runoff in Islamabad's urban areas: A Case Study EMAAR Housing Society


Abstract views: 48 / PDF downloads: 17

Authors

  • Muhammad Zaheer NUST
  • Hassan Akhtar NUST
  • Laila Khalid Abasyn University
  • Filza Fatima Rizvi NUST
  • Ali Nasir Abasyn University
  • Faridullah Khan NUST

Keywords:

Soil Conservation Service, Storm Drainage, Rational Technique, Rational Method, Discharge

Abstract

Peak discharge estimate is often done using the rational method. Because ground properties
and precipitation rates vary, many writers have identified differences in catchment areas that limit the
application of the rational technique in different regions. The researchers generally said that this strategy
might yield findings that are acceptable within 200-acre limits. Nevertheless, in order to verify the
applicability and catchment constraints for the future design of storm drainage systems, it is necessary to
assess the applicability of rational approaches with regard to catchment area for the Islamabad region.
Various places of interest were established, each with drainage areas measuring 663.8 acres, 805.4 acres,
1056.9 acres, and 1529.0 acres. All sites of interest have their corresponding discharge values determined
using the rational technique. The outcomes were then contrasted with the same catchments using the soil
conservation service (SCS) curve number approach. Comparing the data, it was evident that the Rational
Method technique would be more appropriate for developed regions, or bigger areas with different terrain
and area types. Upon completion of this research project, readers will possess the capacity to assess the
suitability of the rational method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Muhammad Zaheer, NUST

 Institute of Civil Engineering (NICE), Islamabad, Pakistan

Hassan Akhtar, NUST

 Institute of Civil Engineering (NICE), Islamabad, Pakistan

Laila Khalid, Abasyn University

Civil Engineering department Islamabad Campus

Filza Fatima Rizvi, NUST

 Institute of Civil Engineering (NICE), Islamabad, Pakistan

Ali Nasir , Abasyn University

Civil Engineering department  Islamabad Campus

Faridullah Khan, NUST

 Institute of Civil Engineering (NICE), Islamabad, Pakistan

References

N. Dhakal, X. Fang, T. G. Cleveland and D. B. Thompson, Revisiting modified rational method," World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, 2011.

Urban storm drainage criteria manual. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD), Denver, 2017.

Debo and Associates, Georgia storm water management manual. Jordan Jones and Goulding Atlanta Regional Commission, 2001.

H. Ahsan, G. Nabi, M. W. Boota and T. Abbas, Development of envelope curve for Indus and Jhelum River basin in Pakistan and estimation of upper bound using envelope curve," Journal of Himalayan Earth Sciences, 2016.

New Jersey storm water best management practices manual, Chapter 5, Computing Storm Water Runoff

Rates and Volumes, 2004.

F. B. Baharudin, A study on rainfall-runoff characteristics of urban catchment of Sungai Kerayong," 2007.

Storm water management & erosion control design manual. Planning & Development Department Infrastructure Division, 2010.

T. G. Cleveland, D. B. Thompson and X. Fang, Use of the rational and modified rational methods for TxDOT hydraulic design," Texas Tech Center for Multidisciplinary Research in Transportation, 2011.

Drainage criteria manual (Vol. 1). Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, 2007.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-19

How to Cite

Zaheer, M., Akhtar, H., Khalid, L., Rizvi, F. F., Nasir , A., & Khan, F. (2024). An assessment of the rational method’s limitations for calculating runoff in Islamabad’s urban areas: A Case Study EMAAR Housing Society . International Journal of Advanced Natural Sciences and Engineering Researches, 8(8), 99–106. Retrieved from https://as-proceeding.com/index.php/ijanser/article/view/2027

Issue

Section

Articles