Student Disciplinary Investigations in Higher Education Institutions in the Light of Judicial Decisions


Keywords:
Student Disciplinary Investigation, Disciplinary Law, Disciplinary Penalties, Procedure For Disciplinary Penalties,, Judicial SupervisionAbstract
The purpose of disciplinary penalties in higher education institutions is to ensure peace, tranquility and discipline within the higher education institution, to prevent acts and behaviors that are incompatible with educational and educational activities and prevent the healthy conduct of educational and educational activities. It is observed that when disciplinary investigations conducted in higher education institutions are transferred to administrative jurisdiction, they are usually canceled because they are faulty in terms of procedure. In the audit conducted by the Court of Accounts at a university; when the case files and results transferred to administrative jurisdiction from the investigations conducted against academic and administrative personnel and students alleged to have committed illegal acts within the university were examined, it was found that 17 out of 21 case files resulted in cancellation against the administration. It has been seen that 16 of the cases that resulted against the administration were caused by non-compliance with the investigation procedures. Therefore, in higher education institutions; due to non-compliance with the procedural provisions, cases are lost, trial expenses and proxy fees are paid, the student who should be penalized as a result of cancellation does not receive a penalty, trust in the law is damaged, and the reputation of the institution is weakened. In this study, the issues that investigators should pay attention to when taking statements and defense, sub-punishment and repetition application, time out, application of court decisions, preparation of an investigation report, notification, issuing a punishment by a disciplinary supervisor or disciplinary board, objection, analysis of court decisions made related to investigations were conducted.
Downloads
References
Council of State 12. Apartment Decision: That a lower penalty should be given by the board authorized to give the main penalty.
Samsun Bölge İdare Mahkemesi, 3. İdari Dava Dairesi, E.2018/781, K.2019/621
Council of State 8. Decrees of the Department.
Danıştay12. Daire, T: 10.4.2018, E. 2016/7454, K. 2018/1485.
Trabzon İdare Mahkemesi, 28.09.2018, 2018/921 K.2018/874.
Danıştay 5. Daire, T: 04.01.2018, E: 2016/20351, K: 2018/619.
Hâkimler Savcılar ve Yüksek Kurulu Genel Kurul Kararları.
Trabzon İdare Mahkemesi, 28.09.2018, E.2018/900, K.2018/881; Samsun Bölge İdare Mahkemesi, E.2018/1814, K.2020/3).
Trabzon İdare Mahkemesinin 28.09.2018 2018/921 K.2018/874 sayılı kararı
Danıştay 12. Dairenin E.2008/4644 sayılı kararı.
Danıştay 8. Dairesinin E.1994/5932 sayılı kararı.
Danıştay 10. Daire, E.1988/1946, K.1990/720 sayılı kararı.
Danıştay 12. Dairesi, 08.11.2000 T. E.2000/3109 K. 2000/3834 sayılı kararı.
Danıştay 12. Dairesi, 24.11.2009 T. E.2007/5084, K. 2009/6597 sayılı kararı.
Danıştay 2. Daire, E.1997/1580, K.1999/2990 sayılı kararı.
Danıştay 5. Daire, 25.12.2001 tarih ve E. 1998/1970 K. 2001/5153 sayılı kararı
Danıştay İdari Davalar Kurulu E. 2004/611, K.2007/2412.
Danıştay 8. Dairesi, E.1996/1016, K. 1998/810 sayılı kararı.
Danıştay 12. Daire, 13.03.2009, E.2007/342, K.2009/324.