An Evaluation on the Impact of Research and Development Activities on the Transformation of Public Administration


Abstract views: 8 / PDF downloads: 27

Authors

  • Alper KARADEMİR Aksaray University
  • Metin KARADEMİR Aksaray University

Keywords:

R&D, Innovation, Budget Managing, Public Sector, Public Administration

Abstract

Recently, there has been a significant increase in the attention devoted to the intersection of
research and development (R&D) and public administration as this factor is crucial to the delivery of
effective services to the public. The purpose of research and development (R&D) activities is not solely to
advance technology; they also serve as a catalyst for the transformation of government administration by
creating innovative solutions to address complex social issues. As governments increasingly rely on R&D
to augment service delivery mechanisms, it's important to consider how this contributes to the ongoing
evolution of public services. As a result, this investigation attempts to explore the procedures by which
research and development activities lead to the creation of new technologies and methods that improve
the efficiency of public services, this enables the administration to respond more effectively to the
evolving needs of the public. Specifically, examples like the emerging concept of smart cities
demonstrate how research and development outcomes can help facilitate public services, including
enhanced transportation, energy management, and environmental protection, all of which ultimately
improve the quality of life of city residents. Additionally, the investigation attempts to assess the larger
impact of R&D on the utilization of public resources, it demonstrates how innovative solutions not only
enhance the allocation of resources, but also increase citizen satisfaction and participation. Through a
comprehensive study of the various aspects of R&D that affect public administration, this research aims
to demonstrate the crucial role of constant innovation in the creation of effective government and the
delivery of superior public services. As a result, it underscores the importance of continued investment in
R&D initiatives within the public sector.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Alper KARADEMİR, Aksaray University

Politics and Public Administration/ Faculty of economics and administrative sciences, Turkey

Metin KARADEMİR, Aksaray University

Bussines Administration/ Faculty of economics and administrative sciences, Turkey

References

Fidanboy, C. Ö., & Sargut, A. S. (2021). Ar-Ge Yönetimi Üzerine Stratejik Düşünceler: Temel Yetenek Tabanlı Bir Yönetişim Modeli Önerisi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (46), 89-107.

Özeroğlu, A. (2011). Türkiyede Ar-Ge Düzenlemeleri Ve Uygulamaları. Öneri Dergisi, 9(36), 105-114.

Becker, B. (2015). Public R&D policies and private R&D investment: A survey of the empirical evidence. Journal of economic surveys, 29(5), 917-942.

Kethudaoğlu, F., & Bayraktutan, Y. (2019). Kamu ve özel sektör ar-ge faliyetleri ve iktisadi büyüme: OECD örneği. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 14(20), 1594-1625.

Aydin, E. (2009). Araştırma-Geliştirme Harcamalarının Kurumlar Vergisi Uygulamaları Bakımından Giderleştirilmesi. Marmara University Journal of the Faculty of Economic & Administrative Sciences, 26(1).

Dönerkaya, S., & Aligholipour, O. (2024). Sürdürülebilir Ar-Ge Ve İnovasyon Perspektifiyle Küresel Ölçekte Ve Türkiye’de Ar-Ge Merkezi Harcamalarinin İncelenmesi Ve Analizi. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Girişimcilik Dergisi, 7(15), 21-37.

Akbey, F., & Uslu, H. (2021). Sürdürülebilir Kalkınmada Kamu Bütçesinin Önemi: Türkiye İçin Ekonometrik Bir Analiz. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 17(4), 1030-1058.

Xu, K., Huang, K., & Xu, E. (2014). Giving fish or teaching to fish? an empirical study of the effects of government research and development policies. R and D Management, 44(5), 484-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12087

Sein, Y. and Prokop, V. (2021). Mediating role of firm r&d in creating product and process innovation: empirical evidence from norway. Economies, 9(2), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9020056

Tebourbi, I., Ting, I., Hạnh, L., & Kweh, Q. (2020). R&d investment and future firm performance: the role of managerial overconfidence and government ownership. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(7), 1269-1281. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3173

Ravšelj, D. and Hodžić, S. (2020). The role of public governance practices for business r&d activity in the eu. Central European Public Administration Review, 18(1), 125-141. https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2020.1.06

Jain, R., Triandis, H. C., & Weick, C. W. (2010). Managing research, development and innovation: Managing the unmanageable (Vol. 33). John Wiley & Sons.

Tiftik, C. (2021). Teknolojı Temellı Araştırma Ve Gelıştırme Faalıyetlerının Genel İstıhdam Üzerıne Etkısı: Sıstematık Derleme Çalışması. İstanbul Kent Üniversitesi İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(2), 95-111.

Jugend, D., Fiorini, P. D. C., Armellini, F., & Ferrari, A. G. (2020). Public support for innovation: A systematic review of the literature and implications for open innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 156, 119985.

Kasımoğlu, M., & Akkaya, F. (2012). Kamu kurumlarında inovasyonun gelişmesinde etkili olan faktörlerin analizi ve inovatif örgütsel modellerin geliştirilmesi. Kültür Sanat Basımevi.

Mohammadzadeh, Z., Saeidnia, H.R., Lotfata, A. et al. Smart city healthcare delivery innovations: a systematic review of essential technologies and indicators for developing nations. BMC Health Serv Res 23, 1180 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10200-8

Gülsoy, S. (2020). Türkiye'de Araştırma, Geliştirme (AR-GE) ve Yenilikçiliğe Yönelik Devlet Uygulamaları ve Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerindeki Uygulamalar ile Karşılaştırılması, Türkiye Için Politika Önerileri (Master's thesis, Ankara Universitesi (Turkey)).

Gamba, F. (2019). Research and development (r&d), innovation and competitiveness: interwoven concepts for the sustainability of entrepreneurial-developmental outcomes. African Research Review, 13(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v13i1.13

Ravšelj, D. and Aristovnik, A. (2018). The impact of private research and development expenditures and tax incentives on sustainable corporate growth in selected oecd countries. Sustainability, 10(7), 2304. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072304

Rehman, N., Hysa, E., & Mao, X. (2020). Does public r&d complement or crowd-out private r&d in pre and post economic crisis of 2008?. Journal of Applied Economics, 23(1), 349-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2020.1762341

Czarnitzki, D. and Lopes-Bento, C. (2010). Evaluation of public r&d policies: a cross-country comparison. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1695426

Maroto, A. and Rubalcaba, L. (2012). The role of r&d in shaping public sector typologies: an european perspective. Modern Economy, 03(07), 873-883. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2012.37110

Colombo, D. and Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2018). Fiscal decentralization and public r&d policy: a cross-country analysis.. https://doi.org/10.5151/enei2018-83

Chu, A. and Lai, C. (2012). On the growth and welfare effects of defense r&d. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 14(3), 473-492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9779.2012.01550.x

Downloads

Published

2024-12-18

How to Cite

KARADEMİR, A., & KARADEMİR, M. (2024). An Evaluation on the Impact of Research and Development Activities on the Transformation of Public Administration . International Journal of Advanced Natural Sciences and Engineering Researches, 8(11), 600–610. Retrieved from https://as-proceeding.com/index.php/ijanser/article/view/2329

Issue

Section

Articles