Wastewater Treatment Using Active Microorganisms and Evaluation of Results
Abstract views: 363
/ 
PDF downloads: 292
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59287/ijanser.550Keywords:
Wastewater Treatment, Active Microorganism, Lower Detection Limit, Chemical Oxygen DemandAbstract
In this study, samples are taken from the facility where the wastewater is located, and tests and analyzes are made with an active microorganism (EM). EM Technology means technology using Active Microorganisms. EM is not composed of a single microorganism, but a mixture of various groups of microorganisms. It has a positive and healthy effect on people, animals, and nature. EM is effective in both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. For this reason, it would be beneficial to apply it at all stages of treatment in conventional wastewater treatment systems, except for the biological reactor. When used in EM-activated wastewater, various compounds are formed that may be beneficial for wastewater (enzymes with high hydrolytic activity and some antioxidant substances). These compounds together with EM microorganisms provide high-capacity purification of wastewater. As a result of analyses using EM, it is seen that the desired values are achieved. Heavy metal determination is made in Çankırı wastewater and water treated with EM using an ICP-OES device at a lower detection limit (LOD) value of the device at ppm level. As a result of treatment with EM, it has been determined that a high concentration of strontium fell to the lower detection limit. This result shows that EM has an effective role in removing heavy metals. It has been seen that the use of EM in wastewater is extremely beneficial in terms of eliminating bad odors, increasing the sedimentation rate of organic matter, and reducing chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and suspended solids amount (SSM). Besides, ionization is suppressed by the anti-oxidation effect. When EM is used, the operating cost will be lower as O2 consumption can be reduced. Since the water will still contain EM microorganisms after being treated, it is thought that wherever it is discharged from the wastewater plant to nature, a great improvement will be observed in terms of vegetation and the environment.
Downloads
References
Apaydın, A., Aktaş, E.D., Kaya, S., The Role of Environmental Isotopes (18O, 2H, 3H) on the Assessment of Recharge State and Groundwater dynamics of Şabanözü/Çankırı Confined Aquifer. 4th National Symposium on Isotope Techniques in Hydrology, 2019.
Atıksu Arıtımı Eylem Planı. T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, Çevre Yönetimi Genel Müdürlüğü, 2017-2023: 1-314.
Bingül, Z., Altıkat, A., Usability of domestic wastewater treatment plant effluent in agricultural irrigation. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 2012: 7(4), 69-75.
Sonune, A., Ghate, R., Developments in wastewater treatment methods. Desalination, 2004: 167, 55-63.
Ben-David, E.A., Habibi, M., Haddad, E., Hasanin, M., Angel, D.L., Booth, A.M., Sabbah, I., Microplastic distributions in a domestic wastewater treatment plant: Removal efficiency, seasonal variation and influence of sampling technique. Science of the Total Environment, 2021: 752, 141880.
Abdelbasir, S.M., Shalan, A.E., An overview of nanomaterials for industrial wastewater treatment. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2019: 36, 1209-1225.
Shahedi, A., Darban, A.K., Taghipour, F. et al., A review on industrial wastewater treatment via electrocoagulation processes. Current opinion in electrochemistry, 2020: 22, 154-169.
Novikov, A., Poddubskiy, A., Dugin, E., Poddybskaya, O., Filimonov, M., Gurina, Wastewater treatment and disposal of individual residential buildings in agriculture. 18th International Scientific Conference" Engineering for Rural Development, 2019: 18, 397).
Rashid, R., Shafiq, I., Akhter, P., Iqbal, M.J., Hussain, M., A state-of-the-art review on wastewater treatment techniques: the effectiveness of adsorption method. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021: 8, 9050-9066.
Shewa, W.A., Dagnew, M., Revisiting chemically enhanced primary treatment of wastewater: A review. Sustainability, 2020: 12(15), 5928.
Jasim, N.A., The design for wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) with GPS X modelling. Cogent Engineering, 2020: 7(1), 1723782.
Ahmed, S.F., Mofijur, M., Parisa, T.A., Islam, N., Kusumo, F., Inayat, A., Ong, H.C., Progress and challenges of contaminate removal from wastewater using microalgae biomass. Chemosphere, 2022: 286, 131656.
Crini, G., Lichtfouse, E., Advantages and disadvantages of techniques used for wastewater treatment. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2019: 17, 145-155.
Oden, M.K., Ozen, K., Midik, E., Contaminant Removal from Drilling Wastewater by Electrocoagulation Method. Aksaray University Journal of Science and Engineering, 2022: 6(2), 152-161.
Van Lier, J.B., Mahmoud, N. Zeeman, G., Anaerobic wastewater treatment. Biological wastewater treatment: principles, modeling and design, 2008: 415-456.
Jain, K., Patel, A.S., Pardhi, V.P. et al., Nanotechnology in wastewater management: a new paradigm towards wastewater treatment. Molecules, 2021: 26(6), 1797.
Yalçın, Z.G., Dağ, M., Aydoğmuş, E., Removal of Dissolved Organic Matter in Drinking Water Using Active Microorganisms (EM). European Journal of Science and Technology, 2022: 34, 10-13.
Yang, Y., Pan, J., Zhou, Z., Wu, J., Liu, Y., Lin, J.G., Gu, J.D., Complex microbial nitrogen-cycling networks in three distinct anammox-inoculated wastewater treatment systems. Water Research, 2020: 168, 115142.
Xu, W., Zou, R., Jin, B., Zhang, G., Su, Y., Zhang, Y., The ins and outs of pharmaceutical wastewater treatment by microbial electrochemical technologies. Sustainable Horizons, 2022: 1, 100003.
Saeed, M. U., Hussain, N., Sumrin, A., Shahbaz, A., Noor, S. et al., Microbial bioremediation strategies with wastewater treatment potentialities–A review. Science of the total environment, 2022: 818, 151754.
