Considerations on Utilizing the Object-Oriented Paradigm in the Development of an MRP-based Production Planning SystemConsiderations on Utilizing the Object-Oriented Paradigm in the Development of an MRP-based Production Planning System
Abstract views: 138
/ 
PDF downloads: 122
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59287/ijanser.564Keywords:
UML, MDA, MRP, Production Planning System, System Development, FlexibilityAbstract
Manufacturing companies today face an increasingly dynamic environment. Development of production planning systems requires approaches that offer flexibility in development of solutions. Applying the UML (Unified Modeling Language) and MDA (Model Driven Architecture) paradigm can ensure compatibility between applications developed on different platforms. The MDA approach to software development becomes an obvious choice. In this approach, the models drive the process of software development. These models are defined at different levels of abstraction to represent various aspects of the system. The transformation of models from one level of abstraction to another, or the transformation of models to executable code is performed by using automated transformation tools. The strength of MDA lies in the fact that it is based on widely used industry standards for visualizing, storing and exchanging software designs and models. The models in MDA are abstracted at three different levels – the Computation Independent Model (CIM), the Platform Independent Model (PIM) and the Platform Specific Model (PSM). The key to the success of MDA lies in automated or semi-automated model-to-model and model-to-code transformations. In this paper, we examine how a platform-independent model of an MRP-based production planning system can be created using MDA approach, from which several platform-specific systems can be achieved, as required.
Downloads
References
N. Slack, S. Chambers, and R. Johnston. (2007) Operations Management, Prentice Hall, Pearson Education.
R. Gumaer. (1996) Beyond ERP and MRP II. Optimized planning and synchronized manufacturing, IIE Solutions, pp. 32-36.
D. Steele, P. Philipoom, M.Malhotra, and T. Fry. (2005) Comparisons between drum-buffer-rope and material requirements planning: a case study, International Journal of Production Research, vol. 43, no. 15, pp. 3181-3208.
R. E. Giachetti. (2009) Design for the entire business: Enterprise architecture has arrived, IE Industrial Engineer Magazine, pp. 39-43
M. Raffai. (2005) Az UML 2 modellező nyelv, Szakkönyv Kiadás alatt, Palatia Kiadó, Győr
L. Krajewski, L. Ritzman, and M. Malhotra. (2007) Operations management. Processes and value chains, Prentice Hall, Pearson Education.
J. Udvaros, N. Forman and S. M. Avornicului. 2023. Agile Storyboard and Software Development Leveraging Smart Contract Technology in Order to Increase Stakeholder Confidence, Electronics 12, no. 2: 426. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12020426
B. Ram, M. R. Naghshineh-Pour and X. Yu. (2006) Material requirements planning with flexible bills-of-material, International Journal of Production Research, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 399-415.
J. S. Her, H. Yuan and S. D. Kim. (2010) Traceability-centric model-driven object-oriented engineering, Information & Software Technology, pp: 845-870
P. Duchessi, C. M. Schaninger, and D. R. Hobbs. (1989) Implementing a Manufacturing Planning and Control Information System, California Management Review, vol. 31, pp. 75-90.
R. Stegerean. (2002) Sisteme modern de conducere a producţiei, Editura Dacia, Cluj-Napoca
W. Xiening. (2006) Research on MDA Model Drive Architecture based on xUML, Computer Development & Application, pp: 46-48
C. Avornicului and M. Avornicului. (2006) Aspects of using MDA paradigm in system development, Proceeding of International Conference on Business Information Systems, Iaşi, pp: 378-385
C. Avornicului and M. Avornicului. (2010) Managementul şi proiectarea sistemelor informatice de gestiune, Editura Risoprint, Cluj-Napoca
